Date: 26th August 2017 at 9:09pm
Written by:

Norwich were humbled 4-0 by a side that have only just been promoted to the Championship and have spent little in the way of squad improvement when they suffered a fraught 90 minutes at The Den on Saturday afternoon.

Instead of a match report (because let’s be honest who wants to read that?) I’ve decided to put a few thoughts down about what is going on and why.

I think most of us thought that this wouldn’t click overnight. A large number of new players, coupled with a brand new playing style was always a recipe for taking some time to get right but after seeing a third (heavy) defeat in five games I’ll admit to being very worried.

Against Millwall, Norwich were physically found wanting against a side that it was obvious were going to be tough and physically hard. In this league, Norwich need to be strong and at least match their opponents in that respect. If they can do that then their ‘superior’ ball players should be able to make the difference.

That just didn’t happen against The Lions.

The goal that started it all came from a long ball and a flick on from our old mate, Steve Morison. He beat Franke in the air, no surprise, and then Gregory (unmarked) couldn’t miss from six yards.

The next goal, just two minutes later saw absolute chaos and panic in the City defence as Saville stroked home from the edge of the area with Gunn all at sea as he tried to make up for his defence’s errors.

The third goal came as a result of defenders backing off and then the fourth from a corner with an opposition player simply wanting it more than a Norwich one.

Cue chants of ‘We want our money back’ from the travelling City faithful.

Timm Klose should return after the international break – I think that is a given now. Russell Martin was widely booed by sections of the travelling support during the game and as he was replaced on the hour mark. It’s very sad to see and hear this happening but he didn’t help his own cause as he was stood up and backed off for the third goal.

Embed from Getty Images

Russ is an easy target, for many reasons and Farke won’t have enjoyed the treatment his Captain received.

The three new defensive additions, Zimmermann, Franke and Husband have all looked pretty poor since first pulling on the Yellow and Green shirt but there are very few options to replace any of them. Lightweight sums them up with Zimmermann and Franke in particular being built like brick outhouses but seemingly made of straw.

Assuming Klose comes in and Pinto stays at right back, Farke needs to think about which of the new Germans or Russ is best placed to partner him. If he chooses Russ, I think that a lot of fans will literally have a meltdown.

Embed from Getty Images

At left back either Stiepermann or Toffolo should be the answer to take Husband out of the firing line for a bit.

What this fragile defence need more than anything at the moment is some protection from the midfield and Reed struggled to provide that on his own at Millwall. Maddison and Vrancic were lightweight at The Den and for all their technical ability, they need to be more effective defensively.

In Alex Tettey, Norwich have a destructive powerhouse on hand to help out but the question is, will Farke turn to him?

Embed from Getty Images

I get the feeling that he doesn’t like Tettey’s lack of passing ability and I can’t blame him. The lad has two feet shaped like a fifty pence piece but he can be a valuable screen to try to solidify the back four. He will run all day and always puts in a shift and at this time, perhaps a second defensive midfielder is required.

After conceding 12 goals in 5 games, something needs to change and it needs to change quickly.

Another option that Farke might turn to is Tom Trybull, none of us really know what this chap is like yet but he is another option.

Daniel Farke has come to Carrow Road with a philosophy, a way of playing and often, as against Millwall, Sunderland and Villa, it sees Norwich have more than the Lion’s share of possession.

However, what use is having a 70% possession stat if you can’t score the goals most would assume should come with it?

Not to mention stopping the opposition scoring at will on the counter.

Norwich had 70% possession against each of these teams but shipped 11 goals in these three games. I found it interesting that we actually had less possession than QPR but beat them 2-0.

I have it on good authority that Farke instructs the squad to always ‘play the percentages’ and if the chance of making a simple sideways pass to retain the ball is around 90%, then the player should take that pass rather than to ‘risk’ a forward pass with ‘only’ say, a 60% success rate.

I thought that something had definitely changed against QPR but the defeats at Villa and Millwall show that not much has changed at all.

Our Head Coach now has the two week international break to work out what is going wrong and what to do about it. It’s the first crisis of his fledgling City career and after publicly saying that he doesn’t expect Norwich to sign anymore players before Thursday’s deadline, perhaps he and Stuart Webber need to open their eyes to the still bloody awful defence that Norwich City have.


Click for the forum

6 Replies to “Norwich Defence Is Still Awful”

  • Webber and Farke have to take responsibility for the Martin situation. If they didn’t know the feeling towards him before setting him up for even more abuse, you have to doubt they did any homework on our club whatsoever. It wouldn’t surprise me if they listened to Delia’s ringing endorsement of him.

  • We look really bad right now. For a while we’ve been vulnerable to teams being physical against us. It seems we’ve lost whatever strength and commitment we previously did have. We are conceding loads of poor goals, we can’t score anything like enough and we’ve got no fight. That doesn’t sound like a top six team, it sounds a whole lot worse than that.

  • I hate the international breaks and the fixture pile ups they cause. With a game every two-there days as we’ve experienced there can be little time to put problems right. The two week break is crucial in adapting to the lessons learned. I still think it will come but it needs to start happening quickly.

  • Just read that Tetty is likely to be gone by deadline day. Brighton a possible destination. Fee around 1 million.

  • The Millwall match was bad ? probably the worst the team has played for many matches. I totally agree that possession counts for nothing if it doesn?t translate into goals and results.
    I find our new ?possession? style a bit frustrating and not very attractive. However if it provides the results we all crave then at least it has merit but at the moment it isn?t. Watching Gunn messing about with the ball and playing short instead of clearing it worries the hell out of me. But not being privy to the coach?s instructions I guess he is just following orders. I realise that Gunn has made a few good saves but he is young and in his first season and I don?t think he is inspiring confidence in the defence at the moment which could be a possible cause of disarray in the back line.
    Russell Martin was poor. He deserves to be remembered as the City stalwart who played so many key games for Norwich over the years not the fading player he is turning into. He should be allowed that privilege before the crowd turns on him completely and forgets all the good games he has played for the club. I hope Farke doesn?t have him running on every week once he gets a full squad back.
    These views are based on watching every City game this year on iFollow as I live in Australia. I realise this is not as good as being at the games and hopefully it looks better first hand at the matches. I agree with Tuckster’s assessment of Tettey and hope Clwyd is wrong about him moving on. However if Farke isn’t going to select him you can’t blame him.

Comments are closed.