Date: 26th August 2018 at 8:48am
Written by:

Going into this game, I was apprehensive. Not just because we were facing the league leaders but more because of the drab, lifeless performance that Norwich put on against Preston.

After watching the first 15 minutes against Leeds though, it felt like I was watching a different team. City were on the front foot and started fast.

They came out of the blocks at pace and went for the jugular, forcing a series of early corners and, I imagine, giving the visitors a bit of a shock. Certainly, the Leeds fans were quiet(ish), early on anyway.

However, after just 26 minutes, City were 0-2 down and the game had taken a distinctly different tone to the first quarter. The first goal came when Krul parried Alioski’s header but he got no luck (I’m being kind to him) as the ball fell to Klich, who just made sure he got a shot on target to open the scoring. That header by the way, was unchallenged and 14 odd yards out.

The second however, was another bad error by Krul, who was beaten at his near post by Alioski. It wasn’t on the same level as the mistake he made against West Brom’s Jay Rodriguez but it was another clanger from the new keeper. I’m beginning to think that there’s a reason that Chris Hughton let him go. Clearly, Krul has some pedigree but he’s showing levels of inconsistency at the moment. Hopefully, regular game time will get that former consistency back and he can lose the ring rust. The only other option is McGovern.

City actually responded to going 0-2 down quite well and saw a Pukki shot blocked wide and then Klose hit the bar with a header just before the break.

You’ve got to take your chances when they come though and despite these chances, City still went in at the break 0-2 down.

The same XI came out for the second half, which slightly surprised me as we needed to get back in the game and as we all know, 2 nil is a funny scoreline. If Leeds get the next goal it’s game over, if Norwich get it then it’s game on.

I gave Daniel Farke credit in midweek for the way he changed formation and made his substitutions to get a win over Preston. I’m not going to give him any credit here though, in fact, quite the opposite.

I get that he wanted to give the starting XI a chance to put things right at the beginning of the second half. They had, after all, finished the first half quite strongly but once we got to the hour mark and still hadn’t got back into it, then he needed to be changing things.

I was very surprised that he didn’t just go 3-5-2, like he did against Preston and get Emi Buendia on. As it turned out, Farke let it drift and on 67 minutes Pablo Hernandez scored a killer third.

Even then, Farke did nothing. He sat down and folded his arms as I watched in disbelief. Eventually, he got up and shouted a bit and clapped his hands but he looked like he’d given up and if I thought that, then what sort of message does it give to the players?

On 75 minutes, Emi Buendia came on to replace Mo Leitner, who I thought had actually done okay. He had certainly affected the game more than Louis Thompson, who stayed on the pitch.

The formation stayed the same though and then on 81 minutes, Marco Stiepermann and Dennis Srbeny, the goal machine, replaced Thompson and Jordan Rhodes, who is a proven goal machine.

Need three goals? Take off your proven striker and bring on Dennis Srbeny. Oh, and keep the formation the same.

Needless to say, this was completely ineffective and we ended up being embarrassed by Leeds.

I should say that Leeds looked very good and are the best team I’ve seen in the league so far this season but, having witnessed that opening 15 minutes, I feel this was a game that we could’ve actually got something from.

It matters not now though. The game is over and we lost, again.

Farke’s inactivity in response to the goals apart, there were a few players that disappointed me here. Ivo Pinto was caught the wrong side of his man (Hernandez) for the cross that led to the first goal and I’ve already spoken about Tim Krul.

Tom Trybull looked laboured as Pablo Hernandez just ran past him to open up the angle for his goal. It was the third goal and it was the killer for Norwich. It was a good goal but if you give a professional player that sort of room then he can do that sort of thing to you.

Louis Thompson struggled I thought, but it’s his first League game for a couple of years so I’m willing to cut him some slack. He just seemed a little laboured and perhaps tired(?).

City had plenty of the ball as usual but as I mentioned above, that first 15 minutes needs to be the norm from now on if anything is to come of this season and the way things are going, I don’t think anything will come of this season.

Keep playing like this and there won’t be anything like the top six challenge that we are all so desperate for. In fact it could be quite the opposite.

If we lose to Cardiff and then Farke becomes the first City manager to lose to Ipswich in a decade then that will be it for him – among the fan base, anyway.

OTBC

 

6 Replies to “Norwich Embarrassed By Leeds”

  • A bit harsh on Thompson who was played out of position as usual by Farke.Why does our head coach keep trying to put square pegs into round holes?Agree most fans will turn if we lose next Sunday and rightly so,the Webberlution is going nowhere.

  • Lol did you honestly have your hopes high of beating us, the first 15 minutes was yours only because it takes us that long to settle down. Once we woke up the game was all but wrapped up, just face it you were outplayed by the best team in the championship, honestly nothing to be embarrassed about.

    • Asim, yes we were outplayed by the best team in the championship but we are frustrated at the manager not changing things until it was way too late. He isn’t proactive enough and it’s embarrassing to be beaten by 3 goals at home in the championship as it hasn’t happened to us since 2006 and we aren’t used to it. Fair play to Leeds though who are a class act

  • Great write up Tucks as usual. Agree with all you say. As you know I’ve been amongst the most loyal to DF on this forum to date but I can’t accept that performance again. I’d say he’s on thin ice with my support for the first time since he came here. Not because we lost , or got thumped for that matter, but as you say, his complete body language and inactivity, for the first time spoke to me and told me he doesn’t know what to do next and that’s worrying. What worried me even more was his statement “We gave our all”. What the hell is that about?! That wasn’t even first gear let alone “our all”. I’m going to remain backing him for now and lets see what the next couple games bring.. I pray he can still turn this around as I desperately want him to be successful. OTBC

  • I have to say while I’m a supporter of the revolution that Webber is bringing to Norwich (aka German style), Daniel Farke is simply not the man. The transfers this season arguably shaped the team how DF wanted, but the results and performance is clearly on the decline. The tactics were off and naive: each and every team that faced Norwich looked extremely likely to score during counter attack, with players looking out of positions, especially at wide areas. Tuckster may be right that nothing had changed tactically, so the next change has to be the one who failed in the tactical aspect, the head coach.

Your Comment